The Muslim world must awaken. Tel Aviv will no longer merely bomb Muslim capitals—it will become the capital.
When the Muslim world was divided, it was done in a way so no country could make a stand alone. After the collapse of the Ottoman Caliphate in 1924, the victorious European empires didn’t merely redraw borders—they dismantled civilisations. The Muslim world was broken into weak, client states governed by rulers who served foreign capitals, not their own people. Boundaries were drawn not to unite peoples but to divide them—into regimes too small to threaten the new order, too reliant on colonial support to assert real sovereignty, and too divided to unite under a common cause.
Winston Churchill, reflecting on British involvement in shaping the region in the early 1920s, admitted:
We did not shape the Middle East—we carved it, like spoils of war, to serve our empire’s interests, not theirs.
French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau had already declared during the 1916 Sykes-Picot negotiations:
There are only two kinds of peoples in the Levant—those who are to be our clients and those who are to be broken.
his was not accidental cartography. It was deliberate imperial engineering. The result is still visible: a Muslim world rich in natural resources but unindustrialised, fractured, and militarily impotent. Its governments depend on foreign weapons, food imports, and IMF credit. Its leaders—whether military strongmen or royal dynasties—remain in power through Western patronage.
Malcolm X once warned of this exact condition:
You can’t have capitalism without racism. You can’t have colonialism without control. And you can’t be free if your mind is still colonized.
Into this fragmented terrain, Israel emerged and evolved—not as a besieged state, but as the region’s only nuclear power, heavily armed, economically integrated with the West, and politically backed by the United States. Its survival strategy matured into a vision of regional hegemony—secured by overwhelming force, permanent Arab disunity, and a global coalition of ideological allies.
A Clean Break: The Doctrine of Pre-emptive Control
The seeds of this strategy were formally articulated in 1996 in a policy document titled, A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, presented to then Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Drafted by American neoconservatives including Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser, the paper rejected any further negotiations with the Palestinians and instead promoted regime change across the Arab world.
Key Arab states—Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon—were identified as threats to Israel’s security and regional influence. Israel, it argued, should “shape its strategic environment” by partnering with compliant states such as Turkey and Jordan to “contain, destabilize, and roll back” opponents.
This strategy was not reactive. It was proactive, pre-emptive, and rooted in the logic of total dominance. Diplomacy was to be discarded in favour of reshaping the region through force before any serious Islamic power could emerge.
From Zionist Blueprint to American War Doctrine: Seven Countries in Five Years
What began as Israeli doctrine soon became American war policy. After the September 11 attacks in 2001, the United States absorbed the Clean Break strategy into its global military agenda.
In 2006, U.S. General Wesley Clark revealed that in the weeks following 9/11, a classified Pentagon memo outlined a plan to “take out seven countries in five years”: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
This wasn’t about Al-Qaeda or terror,” Clark said. “It was about destabilizing governments that stood in the way of our regional project.
Every nation on that list was Muslim-majority. Most had refused normalization with Israel. All were politically or ideologically defiant of Western imperial demands.
The results speak for themselves:
- Iraq was invaded in 2003, under false pretences, with Netanyahu telling the U.S. Congress in 2002:
If you take out Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you it will have enormous positive reverberations in the region.
- Libya was reduced to anarchy in 2011, after Gaddafi called for a gold-backed pan-African currency and Islamic unity.
- Syria descended into a foreign-fuelled civil war in 2011, flooded with arms, mercenaries, and sectarian propaganda.
- Sudan was partitioned in 2011, its oil-rich South torn away.
- Somalia remains a shattered, stateless zone.
- Lebanon is kept on life support, under siege economically and frequently bombed by Israel.
- And now in 2025, Iran—the final pillar of Islamic resistance—is being directly dismantled.
June 2025: The Assault on Iran
On June 13, 2025, Israel launched its largest military campaign against Iran to date. Over 100 coordinated airstrikes hit Iranian command centres, missile depots, air defence systems, and nuclear facilities in Isfahan, Fordow, Shiraz, and Bandar Abbas.
This was not retaliation—it was pre-emption. It was not war—it was demolition. No declaration. No negotiation. Just missiles, fire, and silence.
The international response was chilling: silence from the UN, applause from Western media, and quiet support from Gulf monarchies who offered airspace and logistical aid. The United States gave full diplomatic cover, echoing Tel Aviv’s narrative of “defensive action.”
Iran’s decades-long isolation—engineered through sanctions, disinformation, and diplomatic siege—meant there would be no red lines. No consequence. No deterrent.
Pakistan: The Final Obstacle
With Iran under siege, only one Muslim country remains with nuclear weapons and strategic independence: Pakistan. Though not in direct confrontation with Israel, its Islamic character, its population size, and its support for Palestine make it a long-term threat in Israeli strategic doctrine.
In 2010, Uzi Arad, then Netanyahu’s National Security Advisor, made the chilling objective plain:
The idea of nuclear deterrence in the Muslim world must be broken—whether in Tehran or Islamabad.
This is not about immediate conflict. It is about ideological architecture. The Zionist vision cannot tolerate even theoretical resistance. All rivals must be neutralized—economically, diplomatically, or militarily.
The Zionist Colony: An Outpost of the American Empire
Israel does not stand on its own. It exists as a fortified outpost of American imperial power—armed, financed, and ideologically fused with the empire it serves.
Since 1948, the United States has given over $150 billion in aid to Israel. It shields Israel from consequences at the UN, supplies its weapons, and grants it diplomatic impunity.
But beyond the money lies belief. Neoconservatives and Christian Zionists in Washington view Israel not merely as an ally but as a symbol—the West’s civilisational vanguard in a region they deem culturally hostile and religiously incompatible.
